I managed my impression by selecting which attributes to present. I wanted to make sure she knew I was clean cut. When I asked her to tell me about herself, she responded with her physical measurements. I told her she sounded beautiful, but I was actually looking for details about her personality. I chose to say this because it made me sound like a gentlemen who respects women. She was slow to respond with some traits, and I felt like she was being rude. Her hesitance made me feel like she wanted to talk only about physical appearance and not anything deeper. However, I realize this was my thinking on the terms of the fundamental attribution error. I assumed her slow response was because she was a promiscuous or rude person when it could very well be that she was busy or talking to another person. If it were me who were slow to respond and someone accused me of being superficial or impolite, I would be insulted since I probably had a good reason (or told myself so).
My selves presented were ideal and actual self. Even though ideal self is more likely to happen in an asynchronous environment, I found myself trying to acting the way I felt a gentleman should. Of course, this was due to the fact that I had developed an ideal character before beginning my chat. However, if I decided how I wanted to be viewed each time I entered CMC, I could always portray my ideal self. My actual self was inevitable because at times, I slipped out of character. Being online, I did not put much effort into my character because no one could see me. If it were FtF and I were dressing up as a man literally, I would be more careful. Since I didn’t have to worry about physical traits of a man, I forget to continue my impression after a while. For example, I accidentally used an emoticon and too many exclamation points. I thought I was being friendly and outgoing, but after reading Jason Cohen’s blog, I realized I was wrong. He said that these were classic female chatting characteristics. Oh well! =]
2 comments:
Linda, you blog post was very entertaining to read. It seemed as though you developed a well thought-out character with a great personality. I felt that the person you were communicating with really did think you were a charming man. You were able to “trick” the other person by illustrating only those attributes you wanted to, and hid those that face to face contact would have made unavoidable. I thought it was interesting how you caught yourself out of character during the conversation. I feel most people subconsciously fall into a character and you accidentally fell out! I agree that had you been face to face, you would have been more aware of all of your characteristics, and may not have made the same mistake. All together I think you did a great job of developing a character that was able to corroborate classic theories.
Linda,
While reading your blog I thought it was interesting that you decided to role play as a guy with characteristics that you’d find attractive as a single female. As I was reading your blog I was thinking about what I would do and I decided that it would be easier to create a persona based on myself; just a male version of me rather than my ideal guy. I imagine if I tried to portray my ideal guy I would seem inauthentic and very awkward. But, I think that with the exception of falling out of character you did a successful job of acting as a “gentleman with manners”. This comes from your selecting which attributes to present to “mallgirl”, including correct grammar, being polite, and respectful to women among others. Overall I highly enjoyed your well-written blog and learning about your experience with portraying the ideal and actual self.
Lauren
Post a Comment