The forums are always a wonderful place to find all sorts of people, and by tracking a person’s posts, it becomes child’s play piecing together their habits and characteristics. An advantage of the forums is that veteran posters tend to be more open than in an instant message conversation. Offtopic.com happens to archive many of their “epic” threads, and a quick search for common handles drew my eye to “BMW1600.”
I would prefer to reserve judgment on his openness since his parody of atheists throughout the thread seemed more tongue-in-cheek than scathing. He might very well be one himself, fed up by the constant barrage launched by atheists toward the God-fearing, however unlikely that is. He may be very open or very closed to new ideas, and because of his perchance to parody, his true character is a bit harder to discern. Whether he’s an agreeable fellow or not is up for grabs, considering I didn’t have the opportunity to observe him responding to the threads of others, but his cynicism suggests that BMW1600 may be a bit less than trusting and a lot less than compliant toward others. Same goes for his conscientiousness; while I don’t see any definitive evidence that points toward a meticulous, careful person, there is a feeling that many of his posts were cleverly written to get the most response, positive and negative, from the Offtopic community.
My impressions are evidence for the hyperpersonal theory, which states that, because of the lack of many cues in CMC, one tends to overemphasize the traits of the target person. Even from his sentence, I was inferring things about BMW1600’s characteristics and beliefs. Despite my attempt at objectivity, it is far too easy to see more than what’s there, and because I may never meet BMW1600 in person, I will never know whether my impressions were right or wrong.
4 comments:
Thomas,
I get the "chills" just from seeing the word atheist but after I read your post I was motivated to further research on atheists. Since I know have a little more understanding of them, I would definately say that I learned something from reading this post.
What interests me however is that you mention that you will never know whether your impressions were right or wrong but yet your impressions are evidence of the hyperpersonal theory (over-atrribution). This shows sometimes people can make rather intense conclusions knowing that their conclusions may be wrong when they have FtF interaction or have went along their impression based on the developmental aspect of the hyperpersonal model. I feel as if people want to know someone greatly so therefore make intense impressions about them to make it easier to explain that person's traits to another.
This post has great potential in being innovative. I love to think "outside the box" so this post really interests me.
Fantastic job!
-Saidu
Thomas,
I immediately gravitated to your blog upon seeing the title. It is refreshing, really, to see difference amongst similarity. The majority of the blogs lack titles, so needless to say, yours was a pleasant surprise.
The point that Saidu hits on is the point that I too will focus on. You speak with uncertainty when discussing your impressions. It is true that one can never unmask the true identity of another through CMC. However, I must ask, is not this true with ftf as well?
Individuals are constantly looking for new ways to express their identity, whether it be on facebook or in the classroom. So is it ever possible to truly know someone? I think the ways in which we present ourselves in person and online are completely different. However, the need to change is an innate desire that we all possess. It is near impossible to act the same from day to day.
So Thomas I think your impressions were as accurate as they could have been. You explained them clearly and you supported them coherently. You also expressed your ideas with solid reasoning and analysis. So, overall, great job.
Perhaps there are also elements of the SIP model in your interaction with BMW1600. Although your first impression my have been a little rough, after reading enough posts (or spending more time with him as SIP suggests) you may be able to describe some of his traits with more detail. With 61,263 posts, there is probably plenty of material to formulate a more detailed impression of the user and with enough time you may be able to find out how this post about atheists fits into his personality and beliefs.
You did a nice job of explaining how your own views formed a part of your impression. Over-emphasizing an online individuals traits seems especially common when, like BMW1600, their posts are fairly argumentative. Discussing preferences of movies, for instance, might say just as much about a person's character, yet forms a much weaker impression. Given the lack of cues in an asynchronous discussion, picking up on sarcasm or "tongue-in-cheek" comments can be quite difficult. You have to read into cues unique to the medium to establish the intentions of the posts. As a result, I've seen many such posts be completely misunderstood.
Post a Comment